![]() So yesterday they said that they don't look at player feedback when doing things. Sure they will adjust it and it may become a nice class of ship. But in a game were German BB are balanced around a Battleship running into the enemy line? It wouldn't have a real impact.įor the underwater speed of the video: it's a test of the mechanics. A submarine in a full on naval battle could easily be sink by a stray shot. You could also add that the main reason why they weren't use wasn't because they couldn't, but because no navy were willing to easily lose ships. No wonder Iowa class and Yamato class saw almost no combat and almost all the heavy lift was made by older ship like the Kongo class. Sure, submarine was a strategic ship, just like capital ship were. It was manned? The 1234 men on board at the time says yes. Look at the video they put out and how they had to make subs perform to make them viable. Submarines were strategic weapons, not tactical ones. ![]() It was an attack on a stationary target that was not battle ready. ![]() No the attack on the Royal Oak was not an attack on a capital ship.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |